![Smart Justice issue image](https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2022/02/smart-justice-issue-image.jpg)
Illinois v. Caballes
What's at Stake
Reviewing whether police can expand a routine traffic stop into a drug investigation by using a drug-sniffing dog in the absence of individualized suspicion. DECIDED
Summary
In Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), this Court held that the police may not employ highway checkpoints to search for drugs. This case involves a related question: whether the police may expand a routine traffic stop into a drug investigation by using a drug-sniffing dog in the absence of individualized suspicion.. The ACLU argues that the presence of dogs fundamentally alters the nature of the seizure and therefore requires independent and constitutionally adequate justification.
Legal Documents
-
09/27/2004
ACLU Amicus Brief in Illinois v. Caballes
Date Filed: 09/27/2004
Download DocumentPress Releases
ACLU of Illinois Disappointed with High Court Ruling on Drug Dog Searches, Calls for State Law to Prevent Searches Without Suspicion
ACLU Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Privacy Rights in Police-Dog Case