Keeping Ohio’s Souls at the Polls: Sen. Durbin Holds Field Hearing on Ohio Voting Law
Listen to three prominent pastors talk about the importance of voting, and especially early voting, to their communities »
On Monday, May 7, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights will hold a field hearing in Cleveland, Ohio to examine the impact of Ohio’s new voting law, HB 194. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Chairman of the Subcommittee, will be joined by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), to learn more about how the impact of voter suppression in America’s heartland.
Reverend Emmitt Theophilus Caviness is one of many people the law would impact. In his 51 years as pastor of Cleveland, Ohio’s Greater Abyssinia Baptist Church, Caviness has spent decades advocating for voting rights in his community. During the 2008 presidential election, Caviness’ congregation was one of the many predominantly African-American churches to promote early voting through “take your souls to the polls” programs that arranged for church members to head to polling places immediately following Sunday services.
Caviness, who saw firsthand how the program gave more people in his community the opportunity to participate, explained why early voting is so important: “We should encourage people to vote. We should make it convenient and comfortable for them to vote so that the democratic process will serve the best interest of all people.” And in 2008, early voting did just that, by providing more flexibility for people with work and family responsibilities that make it difficult to get to the polls during prescribed hours on Election Day.
This was a great step forward from four years earlier. After Ohio voters waited up to 10 hours at polling places on Election Day 2004, the state wisely expanded options for early voting in 2006—giving people more options for casting ballots on their days off and spawning initiatives like the “souls to the polls” programs.
But now, the days of long lines at Ohio polling places may be back.
HB 194 drastically limits early voting, eliminates the requirement that poll workers help voters find the proper precinct, and makes voting absentee more difficult by preventing counties from mailing absentee ballot applications to residents. The law passed in June 2011, amidst a wave of state voter suppression laws that are threatening to turn back the clock on progress nationwide by placing new limits on early voting and voter registration efforts, and requiring ID in order to vote. All of these new laws place disproportionate burdens on African Americans, the elderly, people with disabilities, students, low-income and language minority voters.
HB 194 has not yet gone into effect in Ohio, and will not be in effect during this year’s presidential election. That’s because it will be the subject of a referendum on the November ballot, due to the tireless efforts of voting rights advocates, state legislators and labor unions, who worked together to ensure that the people of Ohio will have a voice in determining how their elections are run. For now, voters in Ohio will have the same opportunities to vote early as they did in 2008, but the future of those rights is extremely uncertain.
Monday’s field hearing will be the third Senate Subcommittee hearing examining the new wave of voter suppression laws, and the second time that the Subcommittee has travelled to a state that has been severely impacted by the recent trend, following a January field hearing in Florida.
Other Ohio voting rights advocates have already been speaking out about possible impact of HB 194 on early voting. According to Reverend Aaron Phillips of the Sure House Baptist Church, who has organized trips with his congregation to vote early on the Sunday before Election Day: “That would be devastating to us, not to have the ability to vote early and vote on Sunday when we take most of our congregation, and to get people to participate who would otherwise not be engaged. I think it’s a targeted tactic to suppress the African American vote.”
Read the ACLU of Ohio's statement calling on Congress to support efforts to combat laws that restrict the fundamental right to vote.
Take Action by asking Attorney General Holder to continue enforcing the Voting Rights Act so that every American can vote.
Learn more about voting rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.” -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Court Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be CountedCourt Restores Relief to Cobb County Absentee Voters, Ensures Ballots will be Counted
ATLANTA — On Wednesday, the Georgia Supreme Court restored relief for Cobb County voters who requested absentee ballots before the deadline but did not receive them on time due to the county’s failure to mail them promptly. The Court asked the parties to brief whether the case was still relevant, given the fact that the election contests had already been decided. In response, the groups that filed the appeal, the RNC and Republican Party of Georgia, moved to dismiss their appeal. But the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center explained that, regardless of the election results, without an extension of the absentee receipt deadline, the right to vote of their clients and other affected Cobb voters will still be violated. They emphasized that the right to vote is fundamental, and it is not about which candidate wins or loses, but instead about the ability for every eligible individual to cast a ballot that is counted. Following the briefing, the Georgia Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and dissolved its earlier order that had put a hold on the counting of the affected voters’ ballots. Affected voters in Cobb County will have their absentee ballots counted per the initial lower court order. For these voters, ballots that were postmarked by 7 p.m. on November 5 will be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on November 8. “This change means that plaintiffs in the lawsuit, including many first-time voters, will have their voices recorded in this election,” said Andrea Young, executive director of the ACLU of Georgia. “Our fight for democracy will never stop.” “Because of the unreasonable timelines imposed by Georgia’s SB 202, this is not the first time the system has failed absentee voters, nor is it the first time we have had to intervene to remedy these failures. We cannot let this pattern continue.” said Theresa J. Lee, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. “At the end of the day, it is not about outcomes, it is about ensuring that anyone who requested a ballot by the deadline has their vote counted. As we celebrate today’s form of justice, we’re also looking ahead to prevent these kinds of unacceptable errors in future elections.” “It should not take lawsuits and post-election rulings to ensure that voters can participate in democracy,” said Poy Winichakul, senior staff attorney for voting rights at the SPLC. “But whatever it takes, we will do. The freedom to vote is the most sacred right we have in America — and we are pleased that right will be honored for our clients and many other Cobb County residents who voted absentee.” The ACLU, ACLU of Georgia, and Southern Poverty Law Center filed an emergency lawsuit on November 1, 2024, to ensure that Cobb County voters had enough time to cast their absentee ballots.