Civil Rights Groups Intervene in Lawsuit Challenging Georgia’s New Hand Counting Rule
ATLANTA — A coalition of civil rights organizations intervened in a lawsuit challenging the Georgia State Election Board’s new rule requiring the hand counting of ballots in the upcoming November election. The intervenors, the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP and Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda, argue that the rule will cause delays, making it much harder for the state to meet the certification deadline and risking uncounted votes. They also argue that, as the rule calls for repeated handling of ballots, it could lead to ballots being spoiled which risks voter disenfranchisement. The groups are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Georgia, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the law firm, Morgan Lewis.
"The will of the voters must not be compromised by a last-minute, purposeless rule that violates state law," said Theresa Lee, senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. "By introducing hand counting just before an election, the Georgia State Election Board is setting the stage for major delays on election night and putting millions of ballots at risk. The Board should be strengthening voter confidence -- not weakening it.”
“The hand count rules go beyond the authority of the State Election Board and are an attempt to rewrite the election code for partisan purposes,” said Caitlin May, voting rights attorney at the ACLU of Georgia. “We will keep fighting for this Board to focus its efforts on the real work of protecting the rights of Georgia voters to cast their ballot and have it counted in accordance with state and federal laws.”
The intervenors urge the court to declare that the hand counting rule violates Georgia law, block its implementation, and allow the election to proceed under the established, secure procedures that Georgia voters have come to rely on.
The motion to intervene is here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/10/001_2024-10-01-NAACP-GCPA-Mot-Intervention-and-Br-ISO-vF.pdf
The complaint is here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/10/004_2024-10-01-Hand-Counting-Complaint-vF.pdf
Voting Rights
Eternal Vigilance Action, Inc. v. Georgia
Voting Rights
Eternal Vigilance Action, Inc. v. Georgia
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”