North Carolina
Griffin v. North Carolina Board of Elections (Amicus)
Justice Allison Riggs recently won a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court, but losing candidate Judge Jefferson Griffin refuses to concede. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes retroactively and overturn the election in the absence of any evidence of fraud or impropriety. The ACLU and the ACLU of North Carolina have filed an amicus brief on behalf of scholars of democratic backsliding who warn that Griffin’s maneuvers are part of a troubling trend of democratic erosion in North Carolina.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Visit ACLU of North Carolina
All Cases
21 North Carolina Cases
![Zayre-Brown v. The North Carolina Department of Public Safety](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
North Carolina
Jan 2025
LGBTQ Rights
Zayre-Brown v. The North Carolina Department of Public Safety
The North Carolina Department of Public Safety has continually denied Kanautica Zayre-Brown, an incarcerated transgender woman in their custody, access to gender-affirming surgery.
Explore case
North Carolina
Jan 2025
![Zayre-Brown v. The North Carolina Department of Public Safety](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
LGBTQ Rights
Zayre-Brown v. The North Carolina Department of Public Safety
The North Carolina Department of Public Safety has continually denied Kanautica Zayre-Brown, an incarcerated transgender woman in their custody, access to gender-affirming surgery.
![State v. Wright](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
North Carolina Supreme Court
Dec 2024
Criminal Law Reform
State v. Wright
This case in the North Carolina Supreme Court involves the question of whether the police violated the U.S. Constitution when they searched the defendant, Mr. Wright’s, backpack even after he repeatedly said no to the search requests. The ACLU alongside the ACLU of North Carolina filed an amicus brief arguing that the search was unconstitutional because Mr. Wright’s eventual “consent” was the result of police coercion. Our brief urges the court to consider the totality of the circumstances that make one more susceptible to coercion, including race and poverty.
Explore case
North Carolina Supreme Court
Dec 2024
![State v. Wright](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
Criminal Law Reform
State v. Wright
This case in the North Carolina Supreme Court involves the question of whether the police violated the U.S. Constitution when they searched the defendant, Mr. Wright’s, backpack even after he repeatedly said no to the search requests. The ACLU alongside the ACLU of North Carolina filed an amicus brief arguing that the search was unconstitutional because Mr. Wright’s eventual “consent” was the result of police coercion. Our brief urges the court to consider the totality of the circumstances that make one more susceptible to coercion, including race and poverty.
![Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
North Carolina
Dec 2024
LGBTQ Rights
Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School
Lonnie Billard worked at Charlotte Catholic High School for more than a decade – both as full-time drama and as a long-term substitute teacher – and has won numerous teaching awards, including teacher of the year. In October 2014, Lonnie wrote a Facebook post announcing that he and his long-time partner were getting married. Later that year, the school told Lonnie he could no longer work as a substitute teacher because his engagement and marriage to another man was contrary to the religious principles of the Catholic Church.
Explore case
North Carolina
Dec 2024
![Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
LGBTQ Rights
Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School
Lonnie Billard worked at Charlotte Catholic High School for more than a decade – both as full-time drama and as a long-term substitute teacher – and has won numerous teaching awards, including teacher of the year. In October 2014, Lonnie wrote a Facebook post announcing that he and his long-time partner were getting married. Later that year, the school told Lonnie he could no longer work as a substitute teacher because his engagement and marriage to another man was contrary to the religious principles of the Catholic Church.
![Short v. Hartman](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
North Carolina
Jan 2024
Prisoners' Rights
Short v. Hartman
Pretrial detainees cannot be punished because they have not been convicted of any crime. Yet until recently, courts have applied the Eighth Amendment’s heightened, subjective legal standard applicable to convicted prisoners to claims brought by pretrial detainees. The ACLU is working to ensure that courts apply a lower, objective standard to Fourteenth Amendment claims brought by pretrial detainees.
Explore case
North Carolina
Jan 2024
![Short v. Hartman](https://www.aclu.dev/wp-content/themes/aclu-wp/img/content-links/fallback-case.png)
Prisoners' Rights
Short v. Hartman
Pretrial detainees cannot be punished because they have not been convicted of any crime. Yet until recently, courts have applied the Eighth Amendment’s heightened, subjective legal standard applicable to convicted prisoners to claims brought by pretrial detainees. The ACLU is working to ensure that courts apply a lower, objective standard to Fourteenth Amendment claims brought by pretrial detainees.